Decision tree (and its extensions such as Gradient Boosting Decision Trees and Random Forest) is a widely used machine learning algorithm, due to its practical effectiveness and model interpretability. With the emergence of big data, there is an increasing need to parallelize the training process of decision tree. However, most existing attempts along this line suffer from high communication costs. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm, called \emph{Parallel Voting Decision Tree (PV-Tree)}, to tackle this challenge. After partitioning the training data onto a number of (e.g., $M$) machines, this algorithm performs both local voting and global voting in each iteration.

Given the popularity of decision trees, proposing an efficient parallel implementation of this method is of course very relevant. The proposed parallelization is original with respect to existing methods and it should indeed lead to less communications than other methods. The theoretical analysis is sound and I like the discussion of the impact of the main problem and method parameters that follows from the lower bound provided in theorem 4.1. Experiments are conducted on two very large problems, where, in the limit of the tested settings (see below), PV-tree is clearly shown to outperform other parallel implementations, in terms of both computing times to reach a given accuracy level and communication costs. I nevertheless have two major concerns with the proposed parallelization.

Decision tree (and its extensions such as Gradient Boosting Decision Trees and Random Forest) is a widely used machine learning algorithm, due to its practical effectiveness and model interpretability. With the emergence of big data, there is an increasing need to parallelize the training process of decision tree. However, most existing attempts along this line suffer from high communication costs. In this paper, we propose a new algorithm, called \emph{Parallel Voting Decision Tree (PV-Tree)}, to tackle this challenge. After partitioning the training data onto a number of (e.g., $M$) machines, this algorithm performs both local voting and global voting in each iteration. For local voting, the top-$k$ attributes are selected from each machine according to its local data.